![]() ![]() I try to get everything I can at this stage. I find running the NR filter prior to cleaning the scans to be helpful because it has the effect of causing the smaller specs of dust to stand out a bit better vs. Once I've taken care of NR, I get to work cleaning and spotting any of the larger bits of dust and crap that Neat Image has left behind. It's entirely subjective of course, and Neat Image will - if you want it to - completely smooth any and all noise right out of an image as well. Generally, I find I'll settle on something that actually does leave a faint impression of film-grain in the image (which I have always been very fond of), but removes some of the 'splotchy' look that the larger clumps of grain can impart. detail-removal (and to be clear: Neat Image is VERY clever at figuring out which is which). no scan-stage sharpening applied), auto-profile the image, and then tweak things until I'm satisfied with the level of noise-reduction vs. Neat Image is great - I bring an image in out of Flexcolor (w. ![]() ![]() I shoot mostly 35MM slide-film, and lately it's been rare that I'm shooting anything slower than ISO200 as well, so grain has been a bit of a concern for me. Mike, I've been using the plug-in version of Neat Image for this for quite some time now, and have been extremely pleased with the results. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |